Darren,

I'm putting some documentation together and when that's done, I'll zip the
whole thing and send it directly to you, if you don't mind, for your
comments and suggestions. It'll take me a couple of days.

Laurie

On 9 November 2014 11:14, Laurie Alvey <trukke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'll get on it.
> Laurie
>
> On 8 November 2014 17:42, Darren <fox...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Laurie
>>
>> I would be interested if you could make it available.
>>
>>
>> Warm regards
>> Darren
>>
>>
>>
>> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Ted Roche <
>> tedro...@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:01/11/2014  11:41  (GMT-06:00)
>> </div><div>To: profoxt...@leafe.com </div><div>Subject: Re: Tips to
>> change from Office. </div><div>
>> </div>On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Laurie Alvey <trukke...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I've written a whole load of statistical stuff in VFP (including
>> > correlation and regression) if anyone's interested.
>> >
>> > Laurie
>> >
>>
>> There's an upload library at leafe.com where many contributors have put
>> libraries of useful tools. There's also CodePlex (
>> http://vfpx.codeplex.com/)
>> and the Fox Wiki (http://fox.wikis.com)
>>
>> --
>> Ted Roche
>> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
>> http://www.tedroche.com
>>
>>
>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>> multipart/alternative
>>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>   text/html
>> ---
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/camvtr9cyc2tcqbfb99xejg5hbx2oz0__bujripwb5ad8hqb...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to