Paul,
What Mike said. Since the task is near-enough to impossible, we need to hear
more
about why you 'need' to do it.
Most likely, the reason ENCRYPT is in an FLL is that is wasn't practical to do
it in native fox code;
it's probably in C++ (or C# or Java or something similar). And if MS found it
infeasible, then I'd guess
you're going to have a little trouble with it also.
So it's time to give a bit more thought to what the REAL problem is. Sounds
like you need encryption
but something is getting in the way of using the FLL. So,
a. What alternative encryption methods are available?
b. Why isn't the FLL working?
An answer to either one should solve your problem.
(I'm always a bit flabbergasted by questions along the general line of, "My
boss wants me to re-write
Windows in Visual Basic. How do I do that?")
Dan
----------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:20:41 -0500
> From: mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: VFPENCRYPTION
>
> On 2014-11-18 11:40, Paul Newton wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I need to be able to replicate the ENCRYPT function in VFPENCRYPTION
>> in native fox code rather than loading the FLL. Any ideas?
>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Why can't you just use the FLL?
>
> --Mike
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bay169-w5f27bb9caa1f79855b7c38a...@phx.gbl
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
