Sorry Dave, you may have right, but I am seeing this frequently in other forums.
I hope I'm wrong. El 19/06/2015 16:00, "Dave Crozier" <[email protected]> escribió: > A little hard there Fernando I feel.... > > We have all been through the "what you see, not what you think you see" > syndrome at some point. > > Surely we are here to help any bona fide request for assistance. You can > either ignore the request and move on or try to help... simple... However, > what is obvious to some isn't obvious to others and Man-Wai did take the > trouble to post the code, which in itself is more than many do. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fernando D. > Bozzo > Sent: 19 June 2015 14:50 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: RE: SET PROCEDURE and forms > > So, at the end, the problem is that this guy was to lazy to investigate > the problem using all previous answers, between which this one about SET > PROC closing previous private was answered at the beginning. > > He just patiently waited that some one fixed his code. > > I don't like his attitude, and in future I'm not answering his future > messages. > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGQ_Ju=77iw-+AYPgex88P+QMS6bf0ibODEp_D=j9dwtwx0...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
