On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Ted Roche <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yikes. I understand the words and most of the concepts but have little
> practical knowledge to share.
>
> My experience on a small-scale SOHO network is that VOIP is a pretty
> trivial overhead to the network. As Kevin pointed out, you want to be
> able to prioritize traffic, as latency and quick response will be much
> more important to callers (we all take it for granted that two people
> can carry on a conversation on the phone and interrupt each other. A
> one-second delay makes that enormously aggravating, and 2 or 3 nearly
> useless.)
>
> As for bandwidth, here's a document with some insight:
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/voice-quality/7934-bwidth-consume.html
>
> depending on your choice of compression schemes and codecs, 12
> simultaneous conversations would run 240  - 1000 Kbps. That's Kilo,
> not mega or Giga, so it's pretty unlikely to slow down your database
> queries.
>
> --------------------
>
>
We use Cisco 7945 handsets.  We have 200+ users of these phones.  Still a
few plants have not been rolled over into VOIP yet.

Our ops guy over phones is at another plant today otherwise I'd ask him why
they chose what they did.

-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYL5NGRtT06AXAPnc0bCjnSn5UHEu3U+J=_qaetxt+1...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to