> Well software got kicked in the balls this week when VW emissions testes > were determined to be inaccurate. > > On the plus side nobody died in this wrongdoing but cheating at such a high > level?
Dumping excess pollution in the air can't be good for anybody's health, even if they're not killing anyone in the car. Of course, who knows what other shortcuts they're willing to take? That could include some with immediate safety implications. > Would you every knowingly make code to do likewise if your client needed > it? I deal with daily collection of quality data and would never fix the > value to be within lower and upper ranges that are posted on the report > that is sent to the customer for every truckload. All it takes is one employee who needs the job, or thinks it would be a good idea to circumvent evil regulations. I'd like to think I wouldn't do such a thing, and I'm happy I've never had to face that problem. -Jerry _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/caksnnof0rjv0fwv8s1p7zhjawkjsym2yowqekt0axen_tze...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
