On Jan 13, 2016, at 10:12 AM, Ken Dibble <[email protected]> wrote:
> Other folks using other email providers have reported they aren't getting > profox-tech either. It's therefore unlikely to be a problem at the receiving > end. And there may be several more people who also aren't getting that list > and who, like me, did not think of checking the archives to see if they > shouId be expecting anything. OK, that was a helpful clue. I think I found where the profoxtech mails were getting stuck. Let's see if this makes it through. -- Ed Leafe --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/pgp-signature --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
