On Jan 29, 2016, at 4:34 AM, Alan Bourke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why open source .NET? I did a quick look, but it wasn't mentioned in the article Stephen posted. What is the licensing for .Net? Being open source doesn't mean jack if it isn't also licensed in an open manner. https://opensource.org/licenses -- Ed Leafe --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/pgp-signature --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
