Hi all I copy the correspondence below for your information - I am NOT a happy bunny !
Dear Paul Newton, I'm sorry, no. I did simply test with XFRX 14.7 and XFRX 16.1 and I got the same result. Evaluating of numeric expression depends on SET DECIMAL TO. Miss Martina Jindrová On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Paul Newton <[email protected]> wrote: Hi I have yet another issue that I cannot understand or resolve I have a report expression (sa_trvalue-sa_cost)/sa_trvalue with #UR XLSF="#0.00 %" in the comment. I run the report on the same set of data with XFRX versions V14.7 and V16.0 With 14.7 a particular value displays as 21.04 % which is correct. With 16.0 the same data displays as 21.00 % which is incorrect. I sincerely hope that this can be resolved otherwise I will have spent dozens of hours modifying my reports for no benefit. Paul Newton | Software Engineer | Pegasus, an Infor Company | t: +44 1536 495000 | f: +44 1536 495228 | [email protected] | http://partners.pegasus.co.uk | http://www.pegasus.co.uk _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
