Roxanne's last post appears to have been on 8/25/06.  She was quite active
on UT from 1997 to 2001, but so much after that.
https://www.universalthread.com/List.aspx?ID=251&NoMember=11887

Mike



-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fernando
D. Bozzo
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 11:52 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Rox Seibert

Yes, it is active.

https://www.universalthread.com



2016-06-28 18:47 GMT+02:00 <mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>:

> If any of you are on the Universal Thread, can you tell me if she's 
> still active on there?
>
> tia,
> --Mike
>
> On 2016-06-22 13:42, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
>
>> Bill's mentioning the FoxWiki being offline for 4 days made me think 
>> of some yesteryear prominent Fox folks who seemed to have moved on 
>> (or at least seem to have fallen off the radar).  One that came to my 
>> mind was Rox Seibert.  Her website is no longer valid (just the other 
>> week is was a simple Hello or some one-liner like that, but is now 
>> for sale on godaddy).  I sent her an email wishing her well to her 
>> email address from 
>> http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~RoxanneSeibert~B2B but that came 
>> back no good.  And her http://www.dragboatalley.com/ website is no longer
valid either.
>>
>> Anybody know what happened to her?  I saw somewhere that she's no 
>> longer with eMedicine (or was it WebMD?).
>>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/027301d1d175$fba8fd70$f2faf850$@PioneerDrama.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to