I think the answer depends on whether or not your client needs to know the
number of apples on hand at any given time.  If not, I'd recommend having
separate lines items for singles, cartons, and pallets.  (This is what we do
in our publishing company, where the commodity is non-perishable books, not
apples.)  But if the quantity on hand is important, then you need to go the
two factor route.

Just my two cents' worth.

Mike



-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Sytze de
Boer
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:21 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Unit quantities

In my accounting/invoicing system, clients create product items.

Let's say you sell Apples
You can sell
single apples
apples in a carton (e.g. 25 apples per carton) cartons of apples on a pallet
(e.g. 50 cartons per pallets)

I would like to know how YOU handle the Quantity management.
Do you create 3 different stock items or do you force people to enter 2
factors at invoice time. Qty and Factor, where factor can be (say) Single,
Carton or Pallet.

When you *see* your product profile,
do you see 1125 apples, X cartons and Y pallets and Z singles?

I hope I've explained this satisfactorily.
If its NF, please forgive me.

--
Kind regards,
Sytze de Boer


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/01aa01d25b3a$d3960220$7ac20660$@PioneerDrama.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to