On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Ken Dibble <krdib...@stny.rr.com> wrote: > > > Well, there's a separate problem--the cost of having to appy one or two UDFs > that would have to run on every name-search query. I was hoping, though, to > get some suggestions for UDFs that I could at least test and see if they > aren't impossibly slow.
You might punish the occasional transposer, rather than everyone, by adding a "Find More" button to run the more intensive search. That way, the operators get a fast result when they type correctly, encouraging a positive feedback cycle. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4u3kcfgbdjqhb3kwve+cydu-94zstbtnjb1l1cfaq5...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
