Hey Paul - I think your reply is more in the way of Derailment instead of HiJacking! :-)
I must admit - sometimes when I want a little break from work - I come hang out here in the land of ProFox - just for the entertainment value it affords me! Regards, Kurt Wendt Senior Systems Analyst Tel. +1-212-747-9100 www.GlobeTax.com -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul H. Tarver Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 4:14 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: "An IF | ELSE | ENDIF statement is missing" Not to hijack this thread, but were you two talking about Monty and the errant for the Holy Grail? :) Paul H. Tarver Tarver Program Consultants, Inc. Email: p...@tpcqpc.com -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hill Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 2:11 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: "An IF | ELSE | ENDIF statement is missing" On 13 July 2017 at 18:51, Malcolm Greene <pro...@bdurham.com> wrote: > Not to hijack this thread, but Python's indentation-as-syntax > eliminates problems like this. I know this doesn't solve the problem > at hand, just pointing out how another language handles this situation. It makes it worse! It's the number one reason I don't like Python! I was recently writing some Python code on my Raspberry PI. I got so frustrated I ended up re-writing in C. -- Paul [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f19012...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
