Is there a work around?   Am using O365 Outlook in my testing,   actual
environment will be Office 2016 using a "real" exchange server?

Thank You!
Regards,
Desmond


On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 at 03:29, Dave Crozier <da...@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:

> Desmond,
> Beware if using different versions of outlook as Createobject() and
> Getobject() behave in differing ways to what you would expect.
>
> CreateObject() will attach itself to the running version of Outlook rather
> than starting a new instance which you would expect. In effect is is just
> as though you had issued a GetObject().
>
> This can have an effect on your program flow if the user uses the instance
> of Outlook whilst you are controlling it in code - worst scenario is to
> close outlook completely of course!
>
> Office 2003 and versions prior did not suffer from this problem and
> CreateObject() always used to start a new instance.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> This communication and the information it contains is intended for the
> person or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are
> confidential and may be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail
> in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on
> it. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or email.
>
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise
> the risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent
> via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are
> advised to run your own virus check before opening any
> attachments received as Flexipol Packaging Ltd will not in any event
> accept any liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is
> received.
>
> It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have
> adequate virus protection.
>
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
> Unit 14 Bentwood Road
> Carrs
> Industrial Estate
> Haslingden
> Rossendale
> Lancashire
> BB4 5HH
>
> Tel:01706-222792
> Fax: 01706-224683
> www.Flexipol.co.uk
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Terms & Conditions:
>
> Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the
> property in the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd. ("The Company") has received in cash or cleared
> funds payment in full of the price of the goods and all other goods agreed
> to be sold by the seller to the buyer for which payment is then due. Until
> such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall
> hold the goods as the seller's fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the
> goods separate from those of the buyer and third parties and properly
> stored protected and insured and identified as the seller's property but
> shall be entitled to resell or use the goods in the ordinary course of its
> business. Until such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer
> the seller shall be entitled at any time
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProFox <profox-boun...@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Desmond Lloyd
> Sent: 11 June 2018 22:33
> To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
> Subject: VFP: Task Scheduler
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> Going nuts down here,  have a simple executable generated from a single
> program.  Runs fine by itself.  Grabs s few records then sends out an email
> via Outlook automation.   Which,  btw, does Outlook have to be open to
> run,  or not?  In any event if I run it in the task schedule it shows that
> it is running,  but it never stops or returns to the ready status????
>
> Regards,
> Desmond
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/caajxvampyorphkgdnkfbgvrx8qk6gri31tyo5v_eg934zkm...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to