Yup, You are posting dynamic content on the internet, where all four billion users can interact with it. WordFence at a minimum for security plug-ins. I usually use several.
Users should not be admins; they add add sketchy plugins from random sites and get owned. As Me How I Know (tm). Good passwords for users. Minimize exposure: no comments unless you need them, for example. Still and all, you get a professional-appearing templates, responsive design, basic SEO and a site the user can edit at a pretty reasonable price. I've used it for several not-obvious-they-are-blogs websites my clients maintain. Me, I prefer to design websites with ViM. (But I have a blog, too!) On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Cully <kcu...@cullytechnologies.com> wrote: > Let me throw in a "+1 with extreme caution" for WordPress. > > Pros: > > 1. Flexibility > > 2. Ease in maintaining content > > 3. Multiple authors can contribute content > > 4. Healthy plugin community > > > Cons: > > 1. As the #1 blogging platform, your site will constantly be under attack. > Patch. Patch plugins. > > 2. Performance can be an issue. Content is pulled from a database and can be > slower than a static site. However, there are plugins that help with this > (Who knew!?!) where they cache the pages and make the site faster. > > 3. Editing of advanced / responsive templates still require an experts > touch. That's you! > > 4. If your site gets hacked, it can take a bit to get everything back. Yes, > there is a plugin that will help you with site backups and might be the > fastest way to get a site back after a hack. > > $0.02. > > -Kevin > > > > On 07/17/2018 03:35 PM, Eric Selje wrote: >> >> +1 for WordPress. Very easy but also customizable and lots of templates. >> >> Eric >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Charles Hart Enzer, M.D. >> <cen...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> To keep it simple -- especially not know HTML 5, Java, and such like -- >>> use >>> a What You See Is What You Get and check the coding here for free: >>> >>> - https://validator.w3.org/ >>> - https://validator.w3.org/nu/ >>> >>> >>> >>> *Shai / שי Charles Hart Enzer, M.D., FAACAP* >>> *Aliyah <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliyah>: Cincinnati to Jerusalem >>> <http://www.gojerusalem.com/items/263/German-Colony/>'s German Colony >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Colony,_Jerusalem> May, 2017* >>> >>> >>> >>> *Volunteer Associate Professor of PsychiatryUniversity of Cincinnati >>> Medical CenterWebSite: **EnzerMD.com <http://EnzerMD.com>* >>> *Publications* <http://www.enzermd.com/CV.html> >>> >>> *The Love of Liberty is the Love of Others* >>> *The Love of Power is the Love of Ourselves* >>> >>> -- William Hazlitt, ~1819 >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:23 PM, John Weller <j...@johnweller.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have built and maintain a few very simple websites for some one-man >>>> businesses and local charities using Front Page 2003. I have now moved >>>> over to a Mac with Win 10 on Bootcamp (when it works - Win 10 sucks!) >>>> but >>>> would like to use a suitable Mac product. I know there are some Mac >>> >>> users >>>> >>>> out there :-). Can anyone recommend a very simple web design software >>>> similar to Front Page, ideally low-cost as I don’t make any money out of >>>> these websites. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> John Weller >>>> 01380 723235 >>>> 07976393631 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- >>>> multipart/alternative >>>> text/plain (text body -- kept) >>>> text/html >>>> --- >>>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4topOixX2FXEzjoK8531Je4+VV_iWL8nCZ=sy_47z1...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
