I would agree that it seems kludgey. Worked for a "genius" last gig and
he used it and it was amazing to see it in action operate easily but my
spidey sense said "yeah, no...I don't like it."
On 12/3/2019 11:10 AM, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:
Sounds a little bit like "bad design", but if life demands such
constructs....
You can always get the code from the upmost level by using the "QuatroDot"
operator ::
like class::MyMethod()
If you would need one in between, then you need to do some clever IF
branching in the beginning of each level's code by providing a parameter
when calling the method:
PROC MyMethod
LPARAMETER lSkipIt
IF lSkipIt
RETURN DODEFAULT()
ENDIF
&& regular code goes here
wOOdy
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ProFox <profox-boun...@leafe.com> Im Auftrag von Paul Newton
Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2019 17:00
An: 'profox@leafe.com' <profox@leafe.com>
Betreff: Calling code in parent's parent class
Hi all
Let's say that I have the following situation:
GreatGrandParent -> GrandParent -> Parent -> Class
In Class I want to bypass the code in Parent but call the code in either
GrandParent OR GreatGrandParent.
Is this possible and, if so, how? Many thanks
Paul Newton
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message:
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/910cc082-f32f-b4f9-f2e6-07d9c7272...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
