Hi Chris, We get away with 1 CPU core per server in a VM to get good performance accessing DBFs on a different VM. More CPU cores may help by allowing the server to spread out on additional cores. We don't see a lot of CPU usage per VM. The bottle neck appears to be IO access to the DBFs. With that said, we have over 20 machines that allow a Remote Desktop like connection and 5 separate storage VMs for our 4000+ clients.
The fastest drives you can get (SSD's are a good choice) and a good backup solution. HTH, Tracy -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Chris Davis Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 9:04 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Opinions on Servers Hi All Just a general question ... If you was choosing a server which would run a vfp application using standard dbfs as fast as possible for around 30 users (connected via remote desktop). What server would you choose to get the best performance? Is it CPU's , Hard Drive Configuration, Memory etc ... we can assume that there is sufficient memory for the remote desktop side of things. Thanks Chris. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/000b01d6c1a8$690c5250$3b24f6f0$@powerchurch.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
