Thanks Man-wai

I will definitely follow up on your suggestion if/when I am working with a mix 
of Windows and Linux machines.

PaulNewton

-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech <profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Man-wai Chang
Sent: 25 September 2021 14:20
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Windows 10 Home networking and Explorer

If your NAS OS had WSDD, you could avoid using SMB1.

(My router is running DD-WRT with ksmbd and WSDD2)

Samba 4, shares, wsdd and Windows 10 – how to list Linux Samba servers in the 
Win 10 Explorer | Linux-Blog – Dr. Mönchmeyer / anracon – Augsburg 
https://linux-blog.anracom.com/2020/05/24/samba-4-shares-wsdd-and-windows-10-how-to-list-linux-samba-servers-in-the-win-10-explorer/

Making Linux Samba shares visible to Windows hosts after WannaCry - Doug 
Rathbone 
https://dougrathbone.com/blog/2020/09/14/making-linux-samba-shares-browsable-to-windows-hosts-after-wannacry

Bug #1831441 “Please add WS-Discovery ( WSD ) support for Window...” :
Bugs : samba package : Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1831441

On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 7:15 PM Paul Newton <paul.newton.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Andy
> I'll try to find out if my NAS adapter requires SMB1 - it's  US 
> Robotics Mini NAS adapter

--
 .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/00ba01d7b24c$7a0733f0$6e159bd0$@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to