Bill,
> 1) Chilkat decremented their VFP specific methods and properties so I just > don't see why they would have an interest. > > Could you elaborate a bit on this? I had the opposite feeling that Chilkat was going to lengths to provide functionalities that wouldn't usually be part of a VFP set, like asynchronous calls. Thanks António --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CADj74tGXjWdb6EFdj+Wowo5vO4WJtDjYYKFG1K1XS=xS8i=x...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
