I was using 587 and it didn't work so I changed it to the one recommended by 
the email provider which was 465 - that worked 😊

John

John Weller
07976 393631

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProfoxTech <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Michael
> Glassman
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2023 1:04 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: CDO Email
> 
> John, what port did you change to?  I use 465 for my CDO email, but
> apparently 587 is generally preferred.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 3:24 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: CDO Email
> 
> Hi Alan
> 
> Many thanks! I tried that and it failed but a bit more research showed me I 
> had
> to change the port after which it worked fine - much to my relief.
> 
> John
> 
> John Weller
> 07976 393631
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ProfoxTech <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Alan
> > Bourke
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 8:46 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: CDO Email
> >
> > Apparently you can:
> >
> > .Item("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendtls";) = True
> >
> >
> > --
> >   Alan Bourke
> >   alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to