Thanks for the quick feedback Frank. I will indeed look at that StrictDate 
setting - as it's not a setting I've seen before nor used.

-K
________________________________
From: ProFox <[email protected]> on behalf of Frank Cazabon 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 8:49 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: An Issue with Dates...

[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is 
important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

Hi Kurt,

those dates are ambiguous because different cultures use different date
formats (d/m/y or m/d/y or y/m/d).

I tend to code all my dates using DATE(2025, 3, 26) for example.

you can also check the help on SET STRICTDATE

Frank.

Frank Cazabon

On 26/03/2025 8:28 am, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> ...and I don't mean the fruity kind.
>
> I think this forum is now going to be a bit more active these days!  Anyway...
>
> I've been seeing this error a number of times - when trying to compile things 
> recently (and, in case you're curious - I used an online OCR tool to convert 
> the pic of the error to Txt!):
> **************************
> Error number: 2032
> Error message: Ambiguous date/datetime constant. Use the
> format:
>
> {yyvy-mm-dd{. [hh:mm:ss] [alp]]}
> Line number of error: 51
> Command with error: IF thisform.txtDueDate. Value <
> {1/1/1990} OR thisform.txtDueDate. Value > {12/31/2049}
> Program with error: MPSBATCHTRANSFER.CMDACCEPT.CLICK
>
> The error has been recorded in our error log for our future
> reference,
> **************************
>
> I know that this method of encoding dates in VFP ( the {1/1/1990} style) is 
> indeed an older method. But, at some point - did VFP just simply drop the 
> support of this style of dates usage?
>
> I'm honestly just curious...
>
> -Kurt
> (The OLD VFP Guy who is now Back in the Saddle!)
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/ia2pr13mb661624d4ecc66ac733244df3c3...@ia2pr13mb6616.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to