I think he's more than using it as a keyword, he wants the scatter ... to add the properties to the current object. I'm surprised he hasn't gotten more mundane errors since the class and name are ro at runtime.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 2:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ca's with scatter name objects Lew Schwartz wrote: > I don't see what you're asking. The failures you encountered seem perfectly > reasonable if you forget 'memo' with scatter. On the other hand, I've found scatter ... name this to be problematic since my this's ususally have property names (eg 'name') that duplicate & conflict with field names in the tables in question. > -Lew > > I share Lew's concern---I'd use a variable like 'oRecord' instead of a keyword like 'this' !!! -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
