Why was this thread not marked [OT]? I subscribed to this version of the list, so I wouldn't get this garbage.
Thanks, Nick Cipollina -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chet Gardiner Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Nice Article on fighting Election Corruption Or Florida and Ohio...That's where the dirty elections are now... Oh, bye the bye, hasn't this gone [OT]? Helio W. wrote: >John, you should try to sell your consulting services to the brazilian >government. > >On 1/7/07, john harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Yeah, that's me with the scruff and he took the picture. >> >>You have to understand the demographics of that district. We almost won in >>a >>special election and that was huge. Seventy percent of that district is >>black and that's about the way the general came out. People don't vote in >>special elections, and we knew it, otherwise, we wouldn't have even tried. >> >>John >> >> > > >--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- >multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html >--- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
