I've spent 20 years thinking about why building huge skyscrapers works and
building software doesn’t..

Too many short cuts in software.

1st BIG mistake... Most developers don't even understand their business's
process from beginning to end and by that I mean from ordering the raw goods
to placing the finished product in inventory and from receiving the order to
shiping, testing, and installation of the finished product..

2nd BIG mistake...Not involving the business stakeholders in the design
(yep, I know they don't want to be involved). If a company has 10 depts
including IT that process the product and order, then the manager of that
dept, NOT a subordinate, needs to understand specifically what their dept is
doing and they need to bring that knowledge to the design table with the
other depts and IT. 


Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.virgilslist.com
http://www.tccutlery.com
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MB Software Solutions
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 3:30 PM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] 51 holes to plug? Is that all

Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> Not until software is built like a building..
> Blue prints for every item.... 
>   

Well, then agile development goes out the window then, doesn't it?  It'd
have to be the traditional waterfall approach if that's the way to do it.

--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to