Ted,

> I know that was true back in the FoxBase days, but aren't integer indexes 
> smaller than other types because they are packing integers rather than 
> converting them to strings?

There's also the new(?) binary indexes in VFP 9 that are even
smaller/faster in some scenarios. 

Malcolm


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to