Ted, > I know that was true back in the FoxBase days, but aren't integer indexes > smaller than other types because they are packing integers rather than > converting them to strings?
There's also the new(?) binary indexes in VFP 9 that are even smaller/faster in some scenarios. Malcolm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.