On Jan 18, 2007, at 7:38 PM, john harvey wrote:
> Or put another way, if they don't toe the mark, they will be
> ousted! Didn't
> Galileo have a small problem like that?
Except that the mark in this case is the standard scientific peer
review process. In Galileo's case, and in what you're trying to
imply, it was because he reached a conclusion that differed from the
non-scientific, religious-based world view. This is exactly the
opposite of that: people who want to call themselves 'scientists',
but who subjugate the scientific method to their belief system.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
