[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> that was in 2002
> 
> lost every thing since then as I can't find no contracts
> 
> I made 5680 last year ....ouch....
> 
> Maybe fixing to start doing bookkeeping for an auto repair shop 3 days per 
> week for the grand sum of 150 per week
> 
> whoopie

Well... you see.... I must confess I'm not a good Christian. Tough luck,
sorry ;c)

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From:  Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subj:  Re: [OT] Corporate Executive Pay Redux
> Date:  Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:26 pm
> Size:  1K
> To:  ProFox Email List <[email protected]>
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I made 145000 in vegas
>> when I looked up the ceo s pay on the stock market I found that he was paid 
>> 8 million including options
>>
> 
> You made 145000?? Well, guessing that you are a good Christian... I'm
> short of money right now ;c)
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From:  "Helio W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subj:  Re: [OT] Corporate Executive Pay Redux
>> Date:  Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:51 am
>> Size:  925 bytes
>> To:  "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
>>
>> I was reading the other day that a CEO in the USA gets compensation many
>> times (100x, 200x) greater than that of an average employee. That's exactly
>> what happens in the third world and opposite of what happens in Europe. I
>> don't know about Australia and Canada, Japan and other parts of the world,
>> but I'm curious. Does anybody know?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> HW
>>
>>
>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>> multipart/alternative
>>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>   text/html
>> ---
>>
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to