Charlie, The very likely probability of Jesus' life being (mostly) a work of fiction has been refuted many times, I know. But usually it has been refuted in the same way as evolutionism has been refuted, usually with silly and non-scientific arguments.
For example, you're claiming that scientists address evolutionism gaps by saying alien seeded planet Earth. That is RIDICULOUS. There are scientists that speculate about it, perhaps some even believe on the possibility, but those ideas are very far from being accepted as sound scientific theories. Probably never will. You're putting, as usual, something in scientists' mouth as to easily refute it. Religious people do that all the time. It's pure intellectual dishonesty. It's easy to rebuke lies using another lies. Look, you are stuck in believing things written BY MEN centuries ago, as if they are unquestionable truths. A fairy tale who explains everything with ludicruous ideas. Do you realise you're using ideas written by tribesmen hundreds of years ago as a way to guide your life? And at the same time find that other people who believe in other ancient tribesmen ideas are wrong? Get a clue! On 1/26/07, Charlie Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 03:12 PM 1/26/2007 -0200, Helio W. wrote: > >Charlie, > > > >What are you coming up next? That evolution has already been debunked > too? > > > >I hear all the time religious people claiming that there're plenty of > >"scientific" evidence pointing to criationism and that simply is not > true. > >Criationism is a ludicrous lie. > > I'm not really opposed to evolutionary theory. I think it's quite possible > that's it was the mechanism God used to bring us about. The problem I have > with evolution is in a couple areas: first, the most appropriate and best > study for the proof of evolution should be a "historical" science, not a > "biological" science. Correct? Yet most historical evidence is ignored by > evolutionary theorists in favor of trying to explain things in terms of > what "might" be able to happen biologically. Next, even moving into the > "biological" investigations, the problems with probability are ignored. In > other words, as I recall, the mathematical probability that humans would > result from the process of evolution is so minute that it is reasonably > impossible. But that is generally ignored as well by most evolution theory > supporters (but I think some of the evolutionists do acknowledge the > problem, and they generally address it by saying the Earth was seeded by > aliens). These weaknesses of evolutionary theory should be clearly > presented along with the theory itself, but instead it seems only the > "dogmatic" portions of the theory are put forth in classrooms. > > > >I've watched the documentary "The God Who Wasn't there". There was no > need > >for the movie to convince me, because I pretty much already knew what was > in > >there. > > > >I watched "Da Vinci Code" and found it very silly. You don't need to tell > me > >it was a hollywood movie based on a "best-seller" fiction book. > > > >But the "The God Who Wasn't there" is not fiction. It isn't even > >controversial, as it just shows information available elsewhere. > > > >Before discarding the documentary, watch it first. Or are you scared on > >having to THINK FOR YOURSELF and find the truth? > > I thought I explained why I didn't watch it. From what I can tell, like > you > said, they don't present anything new. The claim that Jesus didn't exist > has been put forth in the past and has been refuted (repeatedly). Why > would > I spend money to watch something I already know is incorrect? > > By the way, the reason I sort of lumped it in with "The Da Vinci Code" was > because the author of that book/movie stated he researched it as if it > were > a documentary. When interviewed he was asked what would he change to make > the movie a documentary and he basically said he wouldn't change anything. > So he was trying to present his "research" as sound. Just like what I'm > sure this movie has done as well. I haven't seen, nor will I pay for, > watching the Da Vinci Code movie. I won't pay to watch this one either. If > it comes out on cable or something like that, I'll probably watch it. In > general it's good to know what your enemies are thinking. :-) > > -Charlie > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
