If someone wants to believe in any one of the many global warming myths, that's fine. Just don't pretend that it has anything to do with science unless they are willing to play by the same rules as everyone else. Faith is not evidence.
--- Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 9, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote: > > > What I do or do not prefer is not at issue here. > What is, is your > > ludicrous attempt to draw a parallel that is, at > best nonsensical. > > It was a non-sequitur. > > > Creationism is stupid because you say so or > because right-wing > > conservatives defend it? > > False choice. It's stupid because it tries to > redefine what science is. > > If someone wants to believe in any one of the many > creation myths, > that's fine. Just don't pretend that it has anything > to do with > science unless they are willing to play by the same > rules as everyone > else. Faith is not evidence. > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > Lisa Nowak Gear! Lust in Space, Nowak? YES WACK!, Astronauts Tool Kit http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
