On Wednesday 14 March 2007 4:53 pm, Jerry Wolper wrote: > Pete said: > > An article in the (print) Weekly Standard a while ago > > summed it up pretty well.... Plame wasn't undercover, > > and had not been for a while. > > Even if she wasn't at that point, it's possible that revealing that > she once was undercover compromised some of the contacts she made > when she was.
Hi Jerry! Yes, that is possible - but the law is specific about whether or not the spook is currently undercover and silent on the contacts. I have a feeling that you have never read the Weekly Standard, and maybe never will. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
