Because a car with similar performance would typically use twice that amount? Because it would be fun?
I have owned a lot of fun, fast cars including a Mustang V8 with a LOT of go-fast parts but the two most fun cars I have ever owned was a Escort GT Turbo and a Suzuki Swift GT. Never forgot the look on the faces of a Corvette driver [it was a '76, perhaps the slowest of all Corvettes] when I dusted them in my Suzuki or the sounds of the waste gate opening up in my Escort and the kick of the turbo charger kicking in. jeff fisher, MCP www.turbofish.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:15 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Reserve your Smart Car Why would I buy the car if the MPG is only 40? --- Jeff Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.smartcarofamerica.com/category/smart_roadster_and_roadster-coupe/ > "The Smart Roadster's 80-hp super-turbo engine > accelerated from 0-100 mph in > 10.9 seconds." > > More my style > > jeff fisher, MCP > www.turbofish.com > > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
