These reporters, ah David ? Ain't it fun ? Basically it was a misquote of a misquote, between zdnet and eweek, then the PodCasters picked it up , thinking both 'authors' had it right, and understood what Sedna is and that YAG's quotes were accurately re-used. Sigh.
There are additions to VFP on CodePlex that live in the VFPx and VFPy codebase camps. This stuff is being released originally as 'shared source' and now that term 'open-source' is being used. The EXE that is Sedna , that ADD ON program requiring the VFP9 runtime modules, will be released free of charge. The SOURCE code to Sedna, on the otherhand, is still questionable as to whether it will be released. I THINK it will be released, but even some of YAG's comments on his blog seemed a bit obfuscated. Maybe I am too used to interpreting 'passive voice' statements from C-SPAN. Hopefully, YAG will clarify again and soon about the source code for Sedna. You can draw your own conclusions after a read here? http://blogs.msdn.com/yag/ Mondo Regards [Bill] -- William Sanders / efGroup {rmv the DOT BOB to reply} VFP Webhosting? You BET! -> http://efgroup.net/vfpwebhosting Failing dotNet Project? -> http://www.dotnetconversions.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
