The fact remains that CO2 in the atmosphere is a
trailing indicator.  The Oceans heat up then CO2 is
released into the atmosphere, CO2 in the atmosphere
doesn't heat up the ocean.



--- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Yeah, but they are melting really fast.  I wouldn't
> be so worried, if 
> the glaciers were taking their time to melt and life
> on earth had 
> 500,000 or 1,000,000 years to adjust and evolve for
> the changing 
> climate, but evolution doesn't work fast enough to
> adjust to glaciers 
> that melt over a couple of generation unless your a
> micro body of some 
> kind. <g>
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LelandJ
> 
> 
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > The Glaciers are melting because the Earth is
> going
> > through a heating cycle due an increase in solar
> > energy.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> Why are the glaciers of the arctic region melting
> at
> >> such an alarming 
> >> pace?  The glaciers were millions of year in
> >> building, and now they are 
> >> melting over a couple of human generations. 
> Sounds
> >> like something wrong 
> >> to me.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> LelandJ
> >>
> >> Robert Calco wrote:
> >>     
> >>> http://tinyurl.com/39kcck
> >>>
> >>> - - -
> >>>
> >>> Patterson said much of the up-to-date research
> >>>       
> >> indicates that "changes in the brightness of the
> >> sun" are almost certainly the primary cause of
> the
> >> warming trend since the end of the "Little Ice
> Age"
> >> in the late 19th century. Human emissions of
> carbon
> >> dioxide (CO2), the gas of concern in most plans
> to
> >> curb climate change, appear to have little effect
> on
> >> global climate, he said.
> >>     
> >>> "I think the proof in the pudding, based on what
> >>>       
> >> (media and governments) are saying, (is) we're
> about
> >> three quarters of the way (to disaster) with the
> >> doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere," said
> Patterson.
> >> "The world should be heating up like crazy by
> now,
> >> and it's not. The temperatures match very closely
> >> with the solar cycles."
> >>     
> >>> Patterson explained CO2 is not a pollutant, but
> an
> >>>       
> >> essential plant food.
> >>     
> >>>  
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> "All the money wasted on Kyoto in a year could
> >>>       
> >> provide clean drinking water for Africa," said
> >> Patterson. "We're into a new era of science with
> the
> >> discussion of solar forces. Eventually, Kyoto is
> >> going to fall by the wayside. In the meantime,
> I'm
> >> worried we're going to spend millions that could
> >> have been spent on something better like air
> >> pollution."
> >>     
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> Global warming assertions are based on
> >>>       
> >> inconclusive evidence put forth in science
> reports
> >> that had not been published yet, he said.
> >>     
> >>> "The media takes (inconclusive) information that
> >>>       
> >> only suggests there could be a climate problem
> and
> >> turns it into an environmental catastrophe," said
> >> Harris.
> >>     
> >>> "They continually say we only have 10 years
> left,
> >>>       
> >> and they've been saying it for 20 years, and it's
> >> ridiculous," he said. "The only reason I got
> >> involved in talking to media is that I think our
> >> resources are being mismanaged.
> >>     
> >>> "Go after something real and tangible like air
> >>>       
> >> pollution." 
> >>     
> >>> - - -
> >>>
> >>> A & Men.
> >>>
> >>> - Bob
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to