every widely accepted theory has been disproven once a new and better theory came into place.
But I can see that I waste my time with those that can't see past the end of their nose. Ed Leafe wrote: > On May 2, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > > >> Explain the difference. >> As you said, ignorance is not something to be proud of, even in New >> York >> City >> > > Gee, I wish I still had my son's 7th grade science book, where all > of this stuff was covered. > > A quick lookup in a dictionary reveals: "A set of statements or > principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, > especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted > and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena." > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/%(messageid)s ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
