Dave Crozier wrote: > Eurico, > I suggest normalising the files for input into your report so that you end > up with one cursor to print from as opposed to using the report DE to set up > all the relationships. > > In the case of differing detail types then add a "record_Type" field to > distinguish the detail level. This makes the whole design of the report > much, much easier regardless of the version of VFP you use. > > I'd prefer to slave over an SQL statement than setting up a complicated > report - especially if the report is ever to be changed. > >
While I can appreciate your comment (as I see it the same way), doesn't that approach defeat the usage of using multiple detail bands in the new VFP9 report writer? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
