Off the top of my head.
the user -u maybe shouldnt have the complete email address.  the -u a -pw 
work together to allow you to use the smtp server..
Most often the user is the part of the email address before the domain

I have been using blat since 1999
the blat.dll wrapper I wrote a few years ago, has never failed me..

http://www.1amsoftware.com/Downloads.htm
it allow you to construct your blat command much like creating a sql 
statment.
Its much easiser to follow that way, at least for me.

Bob Lee




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "MB Software Solutions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:50 AM
Subject: What's wrong with this BLAT string?


> Anyone see the problem with it?  It fails with a return code of 1 when
> called:
>
> atables.txt -to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -s "Data Backup as of
> 05/25/2007 01:40:54 PM" -i [EMAIL PROTECTED] -server
> smtp.mbsoftwaresolutions.com -attach
> "c:\downloads\fabmate\carfaro\data052507\backup\data1_4_671_20070525134039.zip"
> -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] -pw mypassword  -f
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> I'm checking other things now (like proper uid/pwd, etc.) but wondered
> if someone saw something obvious that I didn't.
>
> I'm using 7zip to create a backup of the data folder, then want to email
> it to me.
>
> -- 
> Michael J. Babcock, MCP
> MB Software Solutions, LLC
> http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
> http://fabmate.com
> "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to