Here is some info on Abilene, Texas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abilene,_Texas

Regards,

LelandJ

Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> It has nothing to do with the population.
>
> Look at Abilene versus Fredericksburg.
>
> What is Abilene now ?? Several hundred thousand.
> Fredericksburg is 8,000 or so..
>
> Average wage in Fredericksburg is less then 10 bucks per hour..,
> professional or not..
>
> Average wage in abilene for a professional is probably 50 - 65,000
>
>
> Virgil Bierschwale
> http://www.bierschwale.com
> http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA
> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 7:50 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Iraq's Sadr Overhauls His Tactics, Shiite Woos Sunnis,
> PurgesExtremists
>
> I think one of the reasons labor is so cheep in India is India is over 
> populated.  India is only about one-forth the size of the U.S., but 
> India has a population almost four times that of the U.S.  The 
> population of India is about 1.1 billion, and the population of the U.S. 
> is about 300 million.
>
> The U.S. ranked 6th in the world in per capita income for 2005 with 
> 43,740 and India ranked 137th in the world for 2005 with per capita 
> income of 720 with 187 or so countries listed.
>
> 1.1 billion people is a lot of months to feed and a lot of people 
> seeking jobs for a country the size of India, and India is not greatly 
> blessed with a lot of natural resources.
>
> At one time it was a pain to open any kind of business in India.  The 
> socialist government control all businesses and it could take month, or 
> even year to receive your permit to open shop, if you ever received a 
> permit at all.  Government red tape has been reduced in India since 
> around 1991.
>
> Since India is a Democratic form of government, I wouldn't expect to see 
> a large gap between the very wealthy and the poor.  It would seem that 
> income in India would be distributed in a reasonable fair manner.
>
> http://www.finfacts.com/biz10/globalworldincomepercapita.htm
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
>
> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
>   
>> Here is a little information about the compitition, morality aside.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> LelandJ
>>
>> Bill Arnold wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Sorry but in the US of A morality and economics are joined at 
>>>> the hip, 
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> That fusion is killing us, literally.
>>>
>>> A thought worthy of mention is to remind that "we" are people from all
>>> over the world (and nowhere is that more clear then here in New York
>>> City, btw) who came here to reject tyranny in all it's forms. We have
>>> been slow to come to terms with this modern-day incarnation of same (the
>>> aggregation of immense power in the hands of a few "I have become death"
>>> destroyers), but current events have unmasked the monster and now there
>>> is a groundswell of deeply-seated opposition seeking ways to organize.
>>>
>>> Our great obstacle is that we have no means to organize. Our 2 dominant
>>> political parties are worthless sell-outs (as those pitiful "debates"
>>> made abundantly clear). The only real hope we have  is the Internet, but
>>> it's still in it's infancy and is being fitted with chains, tubes and a
>>> straight-jacket as we speak.
>>>  
>>> On morality, in case you may not be aware, the sense of basic Christian
>>> morality that guided this country for so long has been pummeled by our
>>> programmers to the point where mentioning it evokes negative imagery.
>>> The cross once held deep meaning for many people, but movies, where all
>>> the bad guys wear crosses and there are no good priests to be found,
>>> have torn apart that symbolism. Yet if I ask "to be replaced by what?",
>>> there is no answer, as if no answer is the answer. Some think we simply
>>> need to be ruled by the rich and powerful. More thoughtful people will
>>> argue for reason and common sense, and they may well be right, but human
>>> nature demands symbols, so as powerful as reason and common sense are,
>>> they lack this crucial element. Where does that leave us, I ask?
>>>
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> there is no moral question if the economics stack 
>>>> up. Hence why the jobs are in India, Calcutta rather than India Falls.
>>>>
>>>> ::a
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fine, but I'm not talking about shopping or wages, I'm 
>>>> talking about right and wrong, the implications of being 
>>>> wrong, and how to set things right.
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>     
>>>       
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to