Derek Kalweit wrote: >>> I believe that the fact that v2 was a big overhaul (that's what I heard, >>> anyway) was another deterrent from other developers wanting to jump onto >>> the DotNet bandwagon---no one likes having to retrain over and over so >>> quickly. >>> > > >> Per MSFT, .NET 1.x series was revolutionary, so revolutionary that...it >> isn't supported anymore. >> > > Just like VFP. Well, depending on your definition of 'support' anyways... Let's put it this way, VFP will have Vista support. those revolutionary, revolutionary .NET 1.x apps won't...
Bill _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
