On Wednesday 27 June 2007 13:29, Kristyne McDaniel wrote: > > Hmm, largely untouched by the great Mother$er as well. 2008 > > version [FORTRAN] in the works. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortran > > There's no reason VFP shouldn't be updated as well, other than the desire > of the language owners to kill it. Surely we don't think the billions of > lines of FoxPro and VFP code are going to really be written in something > else or simply evaporate. > > Once a language is widely adopted, it seems reasonable to expect that the > company that owns it has a legal responsibility to maintain it. If not, it > should be released into the public domain. > > At least that's this woman's opinion.
Hi Kristyne! I often agree with you, and I do this time. Not a chance in hell that M$ will do that, but I agree with you that they should. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
