On 7/3/07, Mark Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems a shame, doesn't it, that all that clever table buffering is actually > completely useless...
Well, perhaps you need to reconsider which end of the chainsaw you're holding. > Ok, not completely, but it would appear not to do the job it's meant for > in anything but very simple situations. I would suggest, Mark, that there might be ways of using the tools you are not seeing, as many of us are shipping anything but simple solutions. Perhaps if you ask a few more questions, provide a few more details of the situation you are working with, then others may be able to suggest ways you can use buffering to get the effect you are looking for. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
