Alan Bourke wrote: > Bit quick, eh? > > It's much needed. I got bitten by the notorious file copy performance > problem. Google 'vista slow file copy'. When I was on my 100Mb LAN I was > getting 9b per second copying files to a W2K3 server. That's 9 *bytes* a > second. I nabbed an MS hotfix off some nefarious website, and did a > couple of other things that were suggested and it's back to maybe 60% of > what it would be in XP doing the same thing. it's the new IPV6 network > stack. Grrrrrr. Absolutely ridiculous that something as fundamental as > that wasn't spotted and killed in real-world testing.
Maybe it's 'by design'. "File copying? Sounds illegal to us!" Whil _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
