Ted Roche <> wrote:
> On 8/25/07, MB Software Solutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote: 
> 
>> The percentage of good guys versus the percentage of pirates.  Wonder
>> what the margin is?  Seems like the "one bad apple spoils the bunch"
>> kind of scenario.
> 
> The number of OS vendors who assume you are a thief and require you
> to prove otherwise vs. the number whio trust their customers to do
> the right thing?  

I guess that when someone steals your stuff that you expect to be paid for
you want to prevent it from repeating in the future.  I was told that my
used car app was being hawked by the snap on tool guy.  

I adjusted the sign on process, added encryption and failed the customer
name when they hacked the encryption text.  Granted that customer name was
on all contracts for selling the vehicle.  I put it out with the probable
thief I had.  It took effect 45 days later.  

So if your committed to open source then fine.  If your not, you should
protect yourself as best you can.  I have decorative security doors on my
home to protect me from the bad people.  Why not do the same with my
products out for sale? 


Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159

"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
    can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.6/971 - Release Date: 8/24/2007
2:59 PM
 




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to