>> Can someone comment as to why you would want to design a NON-VISUAL class in a VCX (other than preferring the GUI look for seeing the methods/events in dropdowns)?<<
I think the big loss using PRG-based classes is the loss of Builders and Property Editors. I use these on a regular basis and would not want to give up this productivity booster. I also feel IntelliSense is more robust inside a VCX-based class than a PRG-based one. I use both mostly because some classes can only be done in PRGs. Like Dave I often find myself tinkering and designing in a PRG and then migrate to a VCX when I get closer to what I think is the best solution. One of the reasons Bo moved the GDI+ code to PRGs is the size of the source code. I forget the numbers, but in the case of GDI+ the PRGs add significantly less bytes to the resulting EXE. Less memory and less EXE to pull over the wire results is a performance boost. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
