On 10/23/07, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > committed the sin of not-voting to > > delete an article that I didn't know you had created on Wikipedia > > Are we supposed to know what this is about? I can't see anything on > the Wiki or SB's site...
Sorry, I was too mad to post straight. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lake_Ontario_Waterkeeper> <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SarekOfVulcan&diff=166526164&oldid=165980029> <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SarekOfVulcan&diff=next&oldid=166527308> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#StevenBlack_repeatedly_removing_AfD_template> <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=20071023161755&limit=100&target=StevenBlack> What really set me off, though, was the personal email I quoted from in my first mail, where he talked about the "free hosting of the GarrettFitzgerald article" on fox.wikis.com, pointed out that it was the first hit when you Googled "Garrett Fitzgerald FoxPro", asked me what I had done for him lately, accused me of lying about not being logged in to my Unix Shell account where I get most of my non-list mail, and stated that he had never before been abused as he had been here. I invite any interested parties to compare his contribution list to mine (<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/SarekOfVulcan>) and see if his accusations of "bullying" and "abuse" are accurate. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
