It is a runtime replacing VFP runtime.
The current version is d/l, just ask Christof for a login.
There's also an NG to report issue and get support. All is on the web page.

Frédéric Steczycki 
SYDEV Applications 
 Ne pas imprimer un mail inutilement est un geste environnemental


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> De la part de Stephen Russell
> Envoyé : 8 novembre 2007 16:14
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: Guineu (was Re: [NF] DotNet framework for Linux browsers?)
> 
> On Nov 8, 2007 8:22 AM, MB Software Solutions
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Man-wai Chang wrote:
> > >> This Guineu project, if it succeeds, could be huge, imo, and allow
> folks
> > >> to stay in VFP a lot longer.  Others thoughts on this project?
> > >>
> > >
> > > I second that. A Foxpro VM could possibly kill the jobs Java
> programmers. :)
> > >
> > >
> > And if I read it correctly, this would allow VFP on mobile devices
> much
> > easier, too.  ??
> 
> It appears to be an emulator?  Or did I miss something?  It says that
> you could run a VFP form in a .NET environment but what is the
> advantage of doing that?  Don't you have two runtime environments
> engaged at the same time?
> 
> What about security issues that are addressed in .NET 2?  Are you
> bound by those, and if so what if VFP violates them?  Is the VFP code
> bundled into a dll that ClickOnce deployment can push out?
> 
> __Stephen
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0711080714r14dc800dy96a9
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions
> of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This
> statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid
> to see the obvious.
> 

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to