'fraid you're right Dave - even my "correction" (* 10^10) should have been * 10^8
Paul Dave Crozier wrote: > Afraid not Paul, > > c = 2.998 m/s ???? > > In that case, I can run at the speed of light even at my age. Its not like > you to make a "unitary mistake" like that so I put it down to finger > trouble. <BG> > > Should be 299,792,458 metres per second - but only in a vacuum (no not a > Dyson!), or 3x(10^8)m/s as an approximation. > > We've got to be precise here seeing as Peter started out being pedantic. > > Dave Crozier > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Paul Newton > Sent: 08 November 2007 16:40 > To: profox@leafe.com > Subject: Re: [NF] Shielding my home from excessive radiation > > c = 2.998 m/s > > Dave Crozier wrote: > >> Oh, I forgot, >> >> In fact as Frederick said correctly: >> >> wavelength = 300 / frequency in MHz >> >> Mmm the brain cells haven't completely disappeared yet, it must be all the >> fish I'm eating! In case you wonder what the 300 is, it is the speed of >> light converted down to the correct units to make the equation work. >> >> Dave Crozier >> >> >> >> >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
