>>If a member dips below 0 on average, s/he gets a warning. If a member stays below 0 for 7 days, s/he gets ousted from the list
Great idea, now there will be no one on the list because at one point or another someone will not like what another member posts, therefore scoring a negative, and worst off, they will probably give them the worst grade possible. an even better solution would be for people to realize that they dont have to read everything, or even like everything and if they dont like a post or a topic, then to delete it. Im not likeing how this thread went from talking about virus stories to something that should belong in OT, but instead of complaining or wanting to be taken off the list, i just stopped reading the posts. On Feb 1, 2008 6:53 PM, Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jerry Wolper wrote: > > >> But how would you solve this? > > > > That's a good question. > > I think we should go to a post-rating system, where posts get a rating > of 0 by default, but people can go to a web app and vote from -5 to +5 > for each post. One vote: one member. If a member dips below 0 on > average, s/he gets a warning. If a member stays below 0 for 7 days, s/he > gets ousted from the list and to be reinstated must take a 10-question > quiz and do some volunteer time. > > Oh, wait... bad idea already tried. > :) > > Paul > > -- > http://paulmcnett.com > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
