On Feb 6, 2008 11:59 PM, Ajit Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is really sad to see the chandler project to turn out like this.
I'm surprised to see Matt Asay write such a slanted piece. The Chandler Project hasn't "turned out" at all. They have several products out on the street. They have had some severe changes in direction over the years, and they have (excuse the expression) innovated some interesting stuff. Try this view instead: http://www.wordyard.com/2008/01/11/osaf-cuts-back/ The author, Scott Rosenberg, wrote an acclaimed book on the Chandler project, "Dreaming in Code." It's not "Soul of a New Machine for the Two Thousands" as the book's leaves might have you think, but it's a good read. Chandler was a unique project: started by a billionaire with a cool idea and offices in San Francisco. Most Open Source projects start with a problem and some code. Chandler got managers, full-time employees and white boards and "architects" and were really much more about building a cathedral than solving problems in the bazaar. Nonetheless, some smart guys worked up some really cool code and concepts, which may continue to be developed under the Chandler project name, or be picked up by others. Overall, it was a win. Not a success story like Apache, but not a disaster like Microsoft Bob. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
