Charlie Coleman wrote: > > As for there "cost of change", yep, every time MS releases a patch, there > are hundreds of man-hours at each MS-using site that get spent trying to > mitigate the damage. So you're saying EVERY time MS release a patch then EVERY MS-using site has to spend hours mitigating the damage, because every patch causes problems? Patently untrue. The vast majority of MS patches cause absolutely no problems to the vast majority of the millions of computers they roll out onto. And in my admittedly relatively brief experience in the Linux world I've had plenty of updates and patches screwing things up too. It's the law of averages.
_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
