So what's the rule about replying to a post, like this one, that starts to stray off the original topic. If it qualifies for OT or NF now .. should I change the subject line when I reply?
Cathy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions General Account Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 3:11 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: He who must not be named... Cathy Pountney wrote: > Yep .. it's me. You can run, but you can't hide. You know I'll find you > dear. I just can't resist your handcuffs officer! ;-) > > Cathy > > Cathy -- just so you know (before Mike slams you) -- there's a certain level of discipline required in Subject posting....[NF] means technical stuff but not Fox; [OT] means not-fox, not-technical (basically anything goes), but otherwise, no such [] subject preface is for Fox stuff only, and if you post too many strays out of those bounds, you get dinged by the self-proclaimed list police. (jk...it's really anyone...I like to charge people a $1 to be mailed to Kevin Cully's FoxForward scholarship fund.) [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
