Kevin S. Goff wrote:
> Just to set the record straight on the Wiki  (on 
> http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~FoxRockXArchives)
> 
> I know for a fact that John Petersen (JVP) told Whil and Rainer that he 
> didn't have a problem if they made his old content available for free.  
> In fact, John stated directly to Whil/Rainer that he's fine if 
> developers can benefit from what he wrote back in the 1990's.  JVP 
> simply doesn't want his content being used for a money-making enterprise.  
> 
> John has also stated that it's not "just about him", as he feels that 
> other authors during the period should be given the same opportunity to 
> choose how their previous content should be handled.
> 
> At the very least, what was written on the Fox Wiki is very misleading.  
> At the most, well, with all the facts, you can draw your own conclusions. 
> 
> Whoever was responsible for this should be accountable and should make a 
> public apology to JVP.
> 
> 
> Kevin

Kevin

Since you're clearly in close touch with JVP, you'll probably know the 
answer to this question?

As JVP doesn't want his old content made available for for-profit 
purposes, but is happy for it to be made available for free, will he 
then be publishing them online as several other authors have done, or 
will he agree to a third party (eg leafe.com) making them freely 
available in pdf form for download?

BTW have you seen this?

http://spacefold.com/lisa/post/The-Foxx,-the-Voxx,-and-the-Phoenixx.aspx


-- 
Cheers

============
Brian Abbott
============


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to